In beide gevallen met een 1Ds MKIII
Overigens op photozone gewoon beide met een 5D mark II getest hoor
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
ModeratorCOLON Global Moderators
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News ... ?News=3318" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Part II of the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L II USM Lens Review is now online.
I'm very pleased with the AF performance and image quality this lens is delivering. I've used it a lot since part I of this review - especially for fall landscape photography. The results are superb.
http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2012/11 ... -variation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Canon 24-70 Mk II Variation
The first graph shows the results of 70 copies of the 24-70 f/2.8 Mk II at 70mm (blue dots) and a set of 125 copies of the Canon 24-70 original version (red dots) we tested a couple of months ago. (Note: the axes do not go to zero to give a more expanded view of the points.)
..
One other thing demonstrates the difficulty we have with one of the less-than-expected copies; they’re still better than the best of the 24-70 Mk I versions. They just aren’t as much better as they should be.
..
think it might help to demonstrate how big number differences above are fairly small image differences in the real world. Below are 100% crops of one of the highest rated ten copies of 24-70 IIs and one of the lowest 10 (not counting the bottom 3 that I called not OK). These are 100% crops of an ISO 12233 chart, something a pixel peeper could shoot at home. If you look really carefully I think you can barely tell the best lens. But it’s close.
..
BTW – if you feel the need to ask which was the highest and which was the lowest, then I’ve made my point.
Tijd terug in het aquarium geweest van Burgers Zoo. En vol open f/2.8 vrij vlot tot gewoon snel en nauwlijks tot geen missers. Scherpte is gewoon weg goed. Durf wel te zeggen vergelijkbaar met de 70-200 II.Aestiva schreefCOLON. Als de 24-70 v2 op 2.8 WEL consisitent is met zijn scherpte en een snellere AF heeft, zal dit mijn volgende lens worden!
http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct. ... 494/cat/11" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;The Canon 24-70mm ƒ/2.8L II USM is one of the sharpest lenses Canon has produced. While it is criticized by some for not incorporating image stabilization, its omission allows Canon to produce very sharp results that are often uncommon in a zoom lens.
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Public ... Conclusion" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;A Peerless Performer:
With an DxOMark score of 26, the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 MkII is the highest scoring professional fixed-aperture mid-range kit zoom of any brand in the DxO Mark database and comfortably outperforms rivals as well as the firm’s earlier Mark I version, particularly with regard to the sharpness levels across the frame. We’re used to seeing a noticeable deterioration in performance in the outer fields at longer focal lengths even with high-quality optics from the big-name marques but the new Canon bucks that trend. As for distortion and vignetting, it manages to hold its own against rivals even if it hasn’t quite managed to improve on those over the outgoing Mk I version. In spite of the complex optical construction, some chromatic aberration is visible in the corners that may require additional removal in post-production software but levels remain in line with the best of rival offerings. The main downside, however, is the very high price. At $2,500 the lens is far less accessible than the model it replaces, but the reduction in weight and size coupled with the boost in optical performance looks set to satisfy future demands from as yet unannounced high-resolution cameras.