![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Gr Ruud
ModeratorCOLON Global Moderators
VOor de canon dus alleen de price awarded coating. De motor had-ie al.tokina schreefCOLON The Nikon mount AT-X 124 PRO DX II has a built-in AF motor drive. The motor inside the lens was loaded onto the Nikon mount specification anew. The AF operates smoothly and quietly due to a DC motor that uses a new AF control gear assembly. With the built-in motor, the lens can be used in AF mode with the Nikon D60 and D40 and other silent wave bodies.
The Canon version of the lens already has a built-in AF motor and will benefit from the improved multi-coating.
The optical system of original AT-X 124 PRO DX won awards for its sharpness world-wide. This design was maintained in the AT-X 124 PRO DX II and improved with the introduction of new multi-coating_ system. The new multi-coating helps reduce reflections that can cause flare and ghosting even more than in the AT-X 124 PRO DX.
The AT-X 124 PRO DX II features the one-touch focus clutch mechanism. _ To use the one-touch focus clutch mechanism, move the focus ring forward, towards the front of the lens, for AF or back for MF. This allows for a fast and easy manual over-ride in difficult lighting situations.
Digital single-lens reflex DX lens_ dedicated to digital SLR cameras with APS-C sized sensors.
Moet ik nog meer sites opzoeken voor die scherpte?photozone.de schreefCOLONVerdict
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM delivered a very sound performance with a combination of very decent build quality and very good if not impressive optical results. If anything vignetting at wide-open aperture could be better. The center performance is excellent throughout the range with generally good borders. The level of distortions is surprisingly low and CAs are quite well controlled.
Naturally it makes sense to compare the lens to a serious competitor like the Tokina AF 12-24mm f/4 AT-X Pro DX. All in all the resolution figures are very similar. The Canon has less CAs and a better contra light performance whereas the Tokina shows less vignetting. The build quality of the Tokina is also a little better (the Canon is more than "good enough" though) and finally the Tokina is substantially cheaper (420 EUR vs 670 EUR locally).
So which one to choose ? Well ... that's still up to you.![]()
Ik kan dit tot nu toe alleen maar onderschrijvenhannovandijk schreefCOLONIk heb zelf de Tokina 12-24, een heerlijke lens, degelijk gebouwd f 4 over het hele bereik.
Voor mij gaf de prijs icm de kwaliteit de doorslag.
Idemboels069 schreefCOLONToen ik de EF-S 10-22 kocht (weggedaan i.v.m. aanschaf 5D) waren voor mij de CA, scherpte, ring-type USM met FTM en de afstandsinfo in de EXIF die de doorslag gaven.